Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Catskills Journeys: Guarded Memories of the Holocaust:

  
Huffington Post
Catskills Journeys: Guarded Memories of the Holocaust:

"For in the end, it is all about memory, its sources and its magnitude, and, of course, its consequences." - Elie Wiesel - Night
         Published in The Huffington Post


  
"'Pray for us and remember us, tell your children how we were tormented to death... You my beloved children I bless, the dear God protect and guard you. I embrace and kiss you fervently... farewell, stay pretty and healthy till we meet again in the hereafter. Your always sad, never forgetting you, and so unhappy Mama.'"
Yet, even if Bloomberg is right, I don't want him or any government leader to limit 
While Holocaust tributes and efforts to educate newer generations are always well intentioned and meant to educate and are meant to keep the "lessons" of the Holocaust alive, based on my upbringing, I just don't feel they hold any real true significance anymore in our 2013 world.
by Steven Kurlander


I grew up the child of a survivor of the Holocaust.

Nevertheless, I had never heard of "The Holocaust Cantata" until I had been recently been asked by my friend Lou, who is the president of the Sullivan County Community Chorus, to read two passages from the work. It was going to be sung as part of a tribute to "Jewish Culture" at the group's annual Spring Concert.

The Holocaust Cantata is a collection of songs and readings written by World War II concentration camp inmates and discovered by liberators of the death camps. It premiered at the Kennedy Center in 1998 and has been widely performed since as part of Holocaust remembrance events across the U.S.

Because of my particular upbringing and struggles as the son of a holocaust survivor, I'm not fond of many of the modern day observances, movies, or even history books on the subject.

Nevertheless, when I was asked by Lou to participate in the event, I agreed without thinking about it.

But I immediately had second thoughts about doing it.

I have lived the Holocaust my whole life. Early on, my consciousness was considerably wrought by my relationship with my survivor mother, her often intense and destructive interactions with her family and the different ways she and they coped with their past. When my mother died in 1999 (because she chose not to treat a spot on her lungs found by her doctor and to commit suicide like many other survivors) I felt some of that burden fade.

And agreeing to read for this performance reawakened many feelings that I had not missed.

Being my mother's child, I have a very different perspective about the Holocaust. For example, I absolutely hated the hygienic version of the Holocaust found in Spielberg's Schindler's List. And despite all the amazing work done by his Shoah project, as a Holocaust survivor's child, I find the whole Holocaust business stemming from it has become too Hollywood, too sanitized, and less inimitable with each performance, each tribute, each act of remembrance.

To be blunt, I really detest this Americanization of the Holocaust initiated by Spielberg. It's become too much of a business predicated on a superficial guilt and a growing tolerance and acceptance of such morbid human behavior as just another chapter in World History. Today, it's taught in elementary schools on the level of black slavery and the treatment of the American Indians in American History, part of a political correctness curriculum.

For me, the ultimate and most accurate interpretation of the Holocaust can be found only at Yad Vashem in Israel, and maybe in the old BBC World at War Documentary entitled The Final Solution.

So unlike most, I view the Holocaust as losing its horrific uniqueness, both to time and acceptance of disjointed memories that fit today's times more than historical accuracy.

While Holocaust tributes and efforts to educate newer generations are always well intentioned and meant to educate and are meant to keep the "lessons" of the Holocaust alive, based on my upbringing, I just don't feel they hold any real true significance anymore in our 2013 world.

We Americans are very spoiled. And here in the U.S., Holocaust remembrances and education take place under the guise and perspective of a pampered American Jewish community (that my mother never fit into). There's no way that the emotional renditions of the destructiveness of anti-Semitism, cloaked in the worst of human behavior can truly be comprehended in any manner by those not touched at all by it.

So after several generations, the Holocaust has become merely a part of "Jewish culture."

Having every Jew say the simple Kaddish on Yom Hashoah, Holocaust Remembrance Day, once a year, and nothing more, is just good enough for me.

My motto: Never forget, in a very simple way.

I'm sure the children of survivors of other genocides and ethnic cleansings like Cambodia, the Balkans, Rwanda, and other nations around the globe that have endured similar religious and tribal annihilations have the same feelings. They too will tell you that unless you were raised in the aftermath of the ruins a parent's holocaust existence, you just can't understand the significance of its history, its horrific memory and its burden.

Growing up, like most children of holocaust survivors, I endured the anxiety of dealing with a very domineering, extremely bright woman who demanded that her children live up to their ultimate potential, mostly because she was robbed of that opportunity when the Germans invaded Poland in 1939 when she was nine.

My mother was very intense and severe in her thinking and judgments and still stands as the smartest person I have ever known. But I never lived up to her high expectations and always disappointed her.

My mother the survivor had endured a tragic life where her childhood was robbed by the Nazis and then Russians, and then who further experienced the death of my brother at the age of four. As a child, I watched her endure bouts of mental illness and alcoholism that were mixed with what I perceived as an unquestionable devotion to me, her family, and her heritage.

Unlike many of my other Jewish friends, there were stark pronouncements of Holocaust standards in my household to live by: All gentiles hated Jews, and there was absolutely no buying of German goods (even though they are quite common in Israel). There was no disavowing of one's Jewishness allowed, and the worst anti-Semites were self denying Jews and converts. It was forbidden to date Shiksas or even daring to think about marrying one. I was forbidden to enjoy the music of Wagner. Foremost, Israel had to survive, for if the Jews were pushed into the Mediterranean Sea, we were the next to perish. We were always very close to the next Holocaust.

So, with all my Holocaust baggage, when I found myself sitting in a Catholic Church for the rehearsal of my readings, I got really weirded out. I kept asking myself, would my mother have approved? Or would she have torn me up for participating in the event?

The tribute took place before a packed audience in the church in the hamlet of Woodbourne, ironically ground zero for Hasidic culture that has preempted the old Borscht Belt hotel society during the summer in the Catskills. I soon found myself in front of a pulpit where a huge cross hung, standing before about 200 people, reading the first of two passages, entitled "Singing Saved My Life." Behind me, other readers, some elderly survivors, others children of survivors, sat, tears already welled up in their eyes. I read with some trepidation, feeling a sense of responsibility to deliver a significant reading.

"Among the thousands of men who lived at the camp there were all sorts of talents to be found. It wasn't long before other performers joined us in our evening events to gain a few moments of escape for themselves while provide a means for their comrades in misery to also escape."

After I finished, I sat down and the others took turns reading their passages, which were mixed in with beautiful singing and playing of the cello, clarinet and piano. As the performance continued, the mood in the church grew more somber and intense. The effect was very powerful, and I began to question my cynicism toward the reading.

Then, suddenly, an elderly, handicapped singer seated in the front somehow pushed her walker off the stage, and there was a terrific bang as it hit the church floor below.

The somber Holocaust trance was suddenly destroyed and I was awakened by the absurdity of the moment. It was right out of a Monty Python episode. If glares could kill, the conductors look toward the woman would have done her in-it was Mastercard priceless.

I did all I could do not to laugh, or even smirk. I felt my mother's presence. It was as if she had pushed that walker off the stage to wake up those set Holocaust sensibilities, setting me straight once again and dictating the terms of my feelings and understanding.

The service continued, and I read my second passage. Then, near the end of the service, an elderly Kindertransport survivor got up and slowly walked to the microphone. He slowly, and very emotionally read "A letter from my Mother," her final communication to him and his siblings who had escaped to Great Britain. It was not part of the Cantata.

The simple letter said it all, and just hearing it that moment made it worthwhile for me to be there, to endure the burden that accompanies me as a troubled guardian to the last testament of the real meaning and significance of the memories of the Holocaust:

"Pray for us and remember us, tell your children how we were tormented to death... You my beloved children I bless, the dear God protect and guard you. I embrace and kiss you fervently... farewell, stay pretty and healthy till we meet again in the hereafter. Your always sad, never forgetting you, and so unhappy Mama." 

Kurly 

Steven Kurlander, Esq. is an attorney and communications strategist from Monticello, N.Y. He blogs at Kurly's Kommentary and for the The Florida Squeeze.He can be emailed at kurly@stevenkurlander.com.

Thursday, June 6, 2013

Unabated NSA Snooping: Congress & the Courts need to do their jobs to enforce privacy rights

Published in The Huffington Post on June 6, 2013

This morning, I made a phone call to a client and started the conversation by stating “This phone call may be monitored by the National Security Agency (NSA).”

I have Verizon cell service.  Yesterday, it was reported in the British publication “The Guardian” that the NSA has been collecting the telephone records of millions of U.S. customers of Verizon under a top secret court order. 

Who knows, the NSA may be monitoring my writing of the column, all under the context of national security considerations in the alleged War on Terror.

This is the problem: There’s really no meaningful oversight these days by Congress or the courts to monitor or outlaw such surveillance.

The news has been dominated lately by the Obama Administration’s alleged misuse of executive and military power under the pretext of national security.  The recent news unfolding on the extent of how our government is spying on us, and even killing American citizens, is eerily bearing out George Orwell’s 20th Century vision of the future more than ever. 

Last week, the headlines revolved around the Justice Department’s questionable targeting of Fox’s James Rosen as an “unindicted coconspirator” that resulted in his and even his parent’s phone records being monitored in an effort to determine who was leaking top secrets about North Korea’s nuclear program to the national security reporter.  Do your job as a journalist and face prison.

Now, we have been told that our phone calls are not private to any extent.  Big Brother is listening in.
But while President Obama has dangerously pushed the limits of executive power and perfected Orwellian “doublespeak” in his administration’s unfettered pursuit to monitor its citizen’s movements and expression, there is little question of the ineffectiveness of judicial oversight that is in place to limit such intrusion in our life.

While it’s very dangerous that Obama masks his lack of reverence for individual constitutional rights in continuous proclamations about his reverence for individual constitutional rights, it’s just as dangerous that Congress and the judges charged with oversight are not limiting to any extent his administrations continued violation of our individual rights of privacy.

This type of sweeping surveillance has been going on since 2007 under the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), which initially set the parameters for such surveillance and was extended by Congress last year for another five years.

Under FISA, there’s a secret Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court, which is tasked with oversees requests for surveillance warrants against suspected foreign intelligence agents inside the United States by federal law enforcement agencies (primarily the F.B.I.). 

This court granted an order onApril 25 requiring Verizon to give the NSA, on an “ongoing, daily basis” all telephone calls in its systems, both in the US and between the US and other countries. As a result, millions of US citizens are being monitored. 

While FISA was enacted to set parameters for law enforcement and defense officials to collect physical and electronic surveillance and "foreign intelligence information" between "foreign powers" and "agents of foreign powers,” the revelation of the Verizon order shows how unfettered such power really is when it pertains to domestic spying on American citizens.

And instead of just focusing in the Obama Administration, it’s time to question whether there’s enough constitutional safeguards are indeed in place to temper the unabated pursuit of information from American citizen’s that’s supposed to be private.

It’s the job of Congress and the Judiciary to continuously guarantee that our constitutional rights are not being violated.  The War on Terror does not provide any exception toward the prosecution of those duties. 


We should all be able to pick up the phone and not worry who is listening in ala 1984.

Reader Reaction to "Fat" Column

I just read your column about the liberal self-allowed dispensation on lobbing acerbic (up to outright insulting) comments at fat people.  Excellent point about Mr. Uygur.  No way under any circumstance would he accuse the President of “covering his black ass” with regard to the current slate of scandals his Administration is currently nursing.  In fact, as a liberal, I suspect he would vehemently attack any criticism at all of the President as being racist or a “dog whistle” or having a “racial component”.    

Fat grenades not with standing, your column frames one of the key features of political correctness.  The Left will loudly and relentlessly wrap itself in “Freedom of Speech” (as an excuse to be in your face at will – Bill Maher’s entire career is based on this).  The rest of us are left with “Freedom of (Approved) Speech”.

Have a great day.
Mark

The Skinny on Political Correctness: Time To Stop Discriminating Against Fat Americans

  
The Skinny on Political Correctness:
Time to stop discriminating against Fat Americans
         Published in The Florida Squeeze


  
"There's no better poster child for how anti-fatism pervades our media and society than Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey, whose rising popularity and notoriety has been met along with spiteful, derogatory criticism that seems to always center on his weight."

"Chris Christie doesn't give a damn about the people of New Jersey getting to vote a couple weeks earlier," he said, adding, "All Chris Christie cares about is protecting his own fat ass."
by Steven Kurlander

America is a country where our freedom and liberty are characterized in theory by equality, tolerance and constitutional guarantees against discrimination because of one's race, sex, religion, or origin.

Our country's growing emphasis on political correctness propounded by those on the left and its general acceptance by most Americans stems from an acknowledgment of the democratic value to fight against the basic human traits of hatred, prejudice, and ignorance that cause discrimination and bigotry.

This societal censorship that forbids the use of such basic derogatory terms as nigger, fag, cunt, and other detestable words is not only a result of the raising of the level of decency we show to one another, but sadly to some extent is also a negative byproduct of a liberal fixation to police our feelings, our language, and even our thoughts that has become somewhat overreaching in our daily lives.

What's really distressing is the hypocritical propensity of those on the left who impose upon us such political correctness with obsession, but nevertheless engage in the similar vile language and conduct against fat Americans.

While anti-fatism attitude and acts should be just as be deemed unacceptable bigoted behavior just as much as racial, sexist, and ethnic discrimination, it isn't.

There's no better poster child for how anti fatism pervades our media and society than Governor Chris Christie of New Jersey, whose rising popularity and notoriety has been met along with spiteful, derogatory criticism that seems to always center on his weight.

Remember, we live in a New York and Hollywood driven society where an irrational prejudice and an obsession for skinny continually dominates our daily lives. Both our society's health and fashion fixation on weight is so domineering that political correctness that is rendered to forbid the worst in human behavior and language in other regards of our individual characteristics is blatantly caste aside.

Christie is obese.  And he is the subject of continuous fat jokes by late night comedians and unflattering, mean descriptions of his weight by his enemies.

And while much (actually too much) was made of his recent band surgery he reluctantly disclosed a few weeks back, and significant loss of weight that has occurred since the operation, the media continues to berate a "fat" Christie.

The latest example of this leftist anti-fatism was remarks made by MSNBC "Young Turk" commentator Cenk Uygur.  Uygur decried Governor Christie's decision to schedule a Democratic primary for August 13 and a special election for October 16 (two weeks before a general election) to allow voters, instead of Christie, to pick who fills the vacated Senate seat left in wake of the death of Senator Frank Lautenberg

"Chris Christie doesn't give a damn about the people of New Jersey getting to vote a couple weeks earlier," he said, adding, "All Chris Christie cares about is protecting his own fat ass."

"As a fat New Jersey American," Cenk concluded, "I know I live in a glass house, and brother, I'm calling you out on it."

Both Democrats and Republicans were upset with Christie's choice.

The Republicans wanted Christie to appoint a GOP replacement right away, which would affect the immediate balance of power in the Senate where a number of very controversial bills pertaining to immigration, food stamps and other issues are pending.

The Democrats, and Uygur as well, were upset that a special election is being held two weeks before the general election when Christie himself races reelection.  Anticipating that popular Newark Mayor Cory Booker will draw out otherwise apathetic voters in an off year election, they claim that Christie made the choice so these same voters don't necessarily vote against him  two weeks later and reduce his margin of victory.

While Uygur's criticism of Christie as self serving was probably indeed justified, he senselessly cloaked his ridicule for him in derogatory "fat ass" terms, which not only depreciated his argument, but rendered him another idiotic closeted bigot who picks and chooses when true political correctness should be adhered to.

Imagine if Christie were Afro-American.  Would he have said "black ass" instead of "fat ass?"  Hell no.

And he obviously knew that the comment was wrong but trying to justify it by mentioning of his own girth.

Hey, I'm fat, so I'm allowed even more to call you a fat ass. Wrong.

Uygur owes Christie an apology.  And maybe he should spend a little time pontificating how erroneous it is to call people a "fat ass" and to stop belittling people, even himself, for being obese or overweight.

It's not the American way.

Foremost, Uygur should urge his fellow politically correct liberals to stop being hypocritical in how they choose to belittle people for their looks and weight-and maybe start policing their own thin ranks as well.

Kurly 

Steven Kurlander, Esq. is an attorney and communications strategist from Monticello, N.Y. He blogs at Kurly's Kommentary and for the The Florida Squeeze.He can be emailed at kurly@stevenkurlander.com.

Listen To Kurly's Recent Appearance On The Kris & Berman Show On WSUL
Click & Buy Today


Read Kurly's First Novel! Buy the Google eBook Version of The Dog Days of September by Steven Kurlander for only $3.03. It's a novel about a 
father who dies in the 9/11 World Trade Center attack, a son who goes to fight to avenge his death and how this Iraq War Veteran who comes home after two tours of duty, but never leaves the battle behind him. 
      

Like The Dog Days of September Facebook Page Too! Like us on Facebook
Kurly's Latest Quora Question: Should "Fat" References & Statements Be Deemed Politically Incorrect Too?
Click & Answer



Tweet of the Week
Did you notice that all chunky women have been eliminated from @NBCTheVoice in the finals?  Maybe its not about singing, but lack of girth  






Sign up to receive updates from The Florida Squeeze by email.





Chan Lowe's Latest Cartoon and Blog: Trayvon and the Zimmerman trial


If You Want To Be Removed From Kurly Kommentary Subscriber List,  Email Kurly

Like me on Facebook Follow me on Twitter Find me on Google+ 
border

Steven Kurlander, Communications Strategist, 390 Broadway, Monticello, NY 12701  
(845) 796-8948 - skurl@aol.com - www.stevenkurlander.com 

Copyright © 2013, Steven Kurlander
 
 Like us on Facebook Follow us on TwitterView our profile on LinkedInFind us on Google+Visit our blog